I agree, so should we vote? Should me and Alessio proceed without a formal vote?
I will send a last separate email for the old thread, Simone. On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > > Simone Giannecchini a écrit : > >> As you might remember, I would like to separate the geophysics non > >> geophysics duality from the coverage themselves so that we stop > >> running into the duality images vs models this is trying to push some > >> time in that direction. > > > > Giving more though to that since that time, I now believe that it would not > > be > > appropriate. > > Guys, we're going completely off track. Can we talk about the > merits of the raster symbolizer proposal and eventually spawn another > thread on what the best coverage model is? > > Cheers > Andrea > -- ------------------------------------------------------- Eng. Simone Giannecchini President /CEO GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584983027 fax: +39 0584983027 mob: +39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-solutions.it ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
