Andrea Aime a écrit :
> This is a bug in the dependencies of the renderer module that has to be
> fixed, but suggesting the removal of the gdal based module from GeoTools
> as a cure is an exageration. The deps must be fixed instead.
Yes I agree. If the suggested cure was the complete removal of GDAL modules, I
didn't realized that. As far as I known, Johan was only concerned by the
dependencies that appears in "render".
>> "imageio-ext" is not a dependency like the other ones to us. Some
>> libraries like Apache, JTS and Sun Microsystems are widely trusted
>> (even if they still have bugs). "imageio-ext" is a work in progress by
>> what looks like a subset of the GeoTools community (maybe I'm wrong -
>> I don't know the list of contributors). Being isolated on an external
>> SVN, I don't think it has received the reviewing it would have got on
>> GeoTools SVN (at least not from me - I don't know for other).
>
> It's an unsupported module, that level of review is simply not required.
> If you believe it should, you should make up a proposal to change the
> rules of entry into gt2 and raise the bar for entry and have the
> PMC vote on it.
I was talking about the "imageio-ext" project on dev.java.net, not the
unsupported modules in GeoTools SVN.
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
