Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> I still have no responses. Any objections?
>   
I think I am still waiting for a proposal.

ie A wiki page similar to the ones listed here:
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Proposals

Of importance to me is:
- jira task (you got that)
- tasks with volunteer available for each one
- api change BEFORE / AFTER to help module maintainers make the transition
- documentation change (mostly the developers guide police change eh?)

Cheers,
Jody
> I also propose that we adopt a *FixtureTest convention, like 
> *OnlineTest, to make fixtures more easily recognised. I do not propose 
> any changes to the build procedure at this time, so this is a relaxation 
> of the requirement that all online-resource-based tests be marked as 
> *OnlineTest. The intent is that *FixtureTest will be on the local 
> network or otherwise under the control of a developer, and so these 
> fixture configuration files will not be portable to other developers. 
> This contrasts with *OnlineTest, which can access public resources.
>
> Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
>   
>> I propose that the patch attached to GEOT-1951 be adopted on 2.4.x and 
>> trunk:
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1951
>>
>> The patch (for 2.4.x) refactors OnlineTestCase into OnlineTestCase 
>> (provides connection failure tolerance) and its superclass 
>> FixtureTestCase (provides fixture handling). This change will allow 
>> fixtures to be used for tests where developers have set up services 
>> under their own control, and failure tolerance is not desired. The 
>> original failure-tolerant behaviour of OnlineTestCase is retained (apart 
>> from the small changes listed below).
>>
>> This patch also makes some other minor changes:
>> (1) the "once" flag for stack trace printing is no longer static (does 
>> not make sense for one service to suppress error reporting for another)
>> (2) tearDown no longer final (now compatible with trunk)
>> (3) OnlineTestCase now swallows Exception, not Throwable. If your JVM is 
>> on fire, you want to know about it.
>>
>> Please try to break this patch with your online tests, as I have few 
>> online tests configured.  :-)
>>
>> I am happy to revise and resubmit if anyone has concerns.
>>
>> If the patch is accepted, I will update the Developer Guide to match.
>>
>>     
>
>
>   


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to