Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: > I still have no responses. Any objections?
Sorry, meant to answer, got sidetracked by other stuff. However, I'm not really sure it should be the developer to decide whether the server is under his control. It's usually only the maven user that knows. Say I want to setup unit testing against ArcSDE. The developer has full control over his own instance, he would like to use FixtureTestCase then. But the continuous build admin has to use a remote SDE instance he has no control over, he would like to use OnlineTestCase then. Casting the decision into code does not allow to satisfy both. What about having just one class, OnlineTest, that reads from the property file a flag (skip.on.failure=true), which allows the end user to control what behaviour is the desired one, fail fast, or skip and complain on logs? Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
