Michael Bedward ha scritto: > Hi folks, > > Apologies for my abrupt post on the user list about David A's SoC > proposal. I should have probably been more diplomatic. > > I'm just about to head out the door with the family for a few days > holiday so in case there is more discussion about David's proposal in > my absence here are my thoughts... > > I'm sketchy on the proposal but it seems to involve extensive work > which I would have rather discussed previously, or received patches or > issues etc. Although David says he wrote to me about it I have > searched my gmail and can't find anything (checked the spam too :) > > I'm -1 on the proposal. However if other PMC members support it I've > no problems with abiding by that. Democracy is good.
I trust your judgement. Out of curiosity, where in the world is David's proposal? Just that sort of little comment in his gt-users mail? A real GSOC proposal is usually 10 pages long with details of what you want to do, an introduction of how, a plan with a timeline and so on... Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
