On 8 June 2010 20:22, Andrea Aime wrote: > If we go for a longer name (I also agree Map is not the best choice, also > thinking about code completion mess here) can't we just keep it > named MapContext? :-p > The name comes from an OGC spec like quite a bit of other things in > GT2, so it would be somehow consistent with the rest.
I must admit MapContext is one of my least favourite names. When I first saw it, it said absolutely nothing to me, in contrast to MapLayer for example, which seemed obvious. But I don't feel strongly about this at all :) Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
