On 3 December 2010 20:18, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Justin; I had a go at using the color map stuff and got stuck so we > started in on the function implementation. As Michael indicated he started > cleaning them up to some degree.
To some degree ? They are things of beauty, carefully crafted and polished to a fine lustre. Seriously, they are working properly and the only remaining thing was a query about our interpretation of one of the (many) ambiguous parts of the SE 1.1 spec about the meaning of "fallback value". I asked about this on the relevant mailing list (which seems to have <1 post per year) and never got an answer. > I am not particularly attached to either way of doing things; the functions > were nice in that we could make use of them for working with features as > well as rasters. Well, not with rasters at the moment. At least not via a SLD doc until we have a 1.1 compliant parser. Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build, use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
