On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Now some more useful feedback: a question.
>
> Does WFS have the concept of a fallback value like Symbology Encoding? It
> troubles me that we don't have a way to capturing this as part of
> FilterFactory (as even correctly created functions require a fallback value
> when evaluating in contexts outside their comfort zone).
>
Nope, from what I can see there is no such concept.
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On Friday, 20 May 2011 at 10:04 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>
> I can provide feedback on filterfactory2.
>
> The idea is that FilterFactory limits you to only making perfectly valid
> filters. So any work you are doing for WFS2.0 will probably end up here.
> FilterFactory2 is for our own extensions (such as allowing expressions for
> the left hand side of a spatial filter).
>
> The difference is explained here:
> - http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/library/opengis/filter.html
>
> FilterFactory respects that the left hand side must be a
> PropertyNameExpression:
>
> FilterFactory ff = CommonFactoryFinder.getFilterFactory(
> GeoTools.getDefaultHints );
> Filter filter = ff.propertyLessThan( ff.property( "AGE"), ff.literal( 12 ) );
>
> FilterFactory2 does not:
>
> FilterFactory2 ff = CommonFactoryFinder.getFilterFactory2(
> GeoTools.getDefaultHints );
> Filter filter = ff.contains( ff.property( "THE_GEOM"), ff.literal( geometry )
> );
>
> It is very possible in response to WFS 2.0 that we will need to move some
> FilterFactory2 methods over to FilterFactory.
>
> Finally it is the strong recommendation of mbedward that we stop the
> madness; combine the two things into FilterFactory (and just use javadocs to
> indicate our own variations from the standard). I would totally support that
> :D
>
>
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On Friday, 20 May 2011 at 7:00 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have whipped up a proposal for the functionName changes that have been
> discussed on the list over the past few weeks.
>
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Detailed+Argument+and+Return+Info+for+FunctionName
>
> Feedback welcome.
>
> One thing I was sure about was how to update FilterFactory. IT seems all
> new methods are put into FilterFactory2? Do they ever get pushed back up?
> Not sure what the policy is here.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Justin
>
> --
> Justin Deoliveira
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
> Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its
> next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran
> developers boost performance applications - including clusters.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>
>
>
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran
developers boost performance applications - including clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
