On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeol...@opengeo.org>wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have whipped up a proposal for the functionName changes that have been
> discussed on the list over the past few weeks.
>
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Detailed+Argument+and+Return+Info+for+FunctionName
>
> Feedback welcome.
>
I only had a quick run at it, but it looks good. Questions:
- I see only a few functions have been updated to have a full function name:
what is going to happen with the
others? I guess there is some sort of defaults triggering? How are the WFS
2.0 caps going to look like when the
defaults trigger in? Would be nice to include an explanation of the
defaults in the proposal
- I have the impression you're adding the same methods to both FilterFactory
interfaces. Afaik one extends
from the other so adding it to the base FilterFactory interface should be
enough?
Cheers
Andrea
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran
developers boost performance applications - including clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
