All looks good, Michael. Thanks.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Michael Bedward
<[email protected]>wrote:
> Yes I guess it will be fine for many situations, so we could add the
> simplification option to the jaitools operation, using DP for the
> moment, with a note in the javadocs about it being the user's
> responsibility to check for a valid result - thus washing our hands :)
>
> Here is a jaitools issue. Please edit it if I've omitted or mangled
> anything:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/jaitools/issues/detail?id=207
>
> Michael
>
> On 5 October 2012 10:18, Martin Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > As long as the simplification tolerance is small enough, the current
> > non-topologically-safe approach is fine for my use case (which involves
> > contouring smooth surfaces, so with very little chance of contour
> collision
> > - see attached image for an example). And I suspect many other
> situations
> > as well.
> >
>
--
Martin Davis
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel