On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2) Even for an unsupported module we expect a committer to come along for
> the ride (to keep GeoTools from being a dumping ground)
>
> It could be I am wrong about (2) please advise.
>
No, I fully agree that adding a new module with no one looking after it
makes no sense,
especially with a situation where the already exisiting netcdf module
(unsupported/coveage-experiment/netcdf)
is about to see a large injection of new code, providing more functionality
out of the box, and has core
devs backing it.
Having two modules with the same functionality is odd, but as along as they
are both unsupported, well, let the
best one win?
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
