On 16/03/15 10:48, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 16/03/15 08:55, Andrea Aime wrote: >>> * GeoTools is a stand alone project, demanding people that are not >>> interested in GeoServer to also build GeoServer is wrong >> But projects that care about their users should at least keep an eye on >> known downstream builds and fix failures with alacrity. Especially when the >> developer is on the committees of both projects. And especially especially >> when tampering with ContentDataStore. > Yes... that makes sense when we have a committer working in both projects. > I'm just saying we cannot ask a GeoServer build to the random GeoTools > contributor.
Agreed. But feel free to conscript a PMC member to perform a test build if you suspect that a change might affect a downstream. You can do the thinking and delegate the donkey work. :-) -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineer Transient Software <http://transient.nz> New Zealand ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
