On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Mauricio Pazos <[email protected]>wrote:
> It could be, but as I comment in the other email thread, taking into
> account
> the new Filter Encoding 2.0 (version 2.0.0) specification which allows
> Geometry or Envelop as argument, we could think to provide a geotools
> implementation, that mean a change in the api and new implementations for
> filter and cql/ecql (mmm ... I would like deprecate cql).
>
Err... what if someone tries to build a ogc catalog on top of GeoTools?
There would be value in having a CQL parser that can flag invalid CQL
expressions.
I mean, generally speaking all that would be needed is a validator, but
wondering if
building a validator without doing also the parser is possible
Cheers
Andrea
--
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-GT2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
