You can say that again...!
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Andrew Larcombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>The problem with Neogeography is really nailing down what it is - and the >>only way to define something (short of true >ontological categories) is to >>use known ideas in the definition. > > I suspect that the question 'What is neogeography/a neogeographer?' would be > better answered by a rhetorician than an ontologist. > > £0.02 > > _______________________________________________ > Geowanking mailing list > [email protected] > http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org > _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
