I agree, moving beyond the false dichotomy is a step in the right direction.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Mike Liebhold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've remained silent during all of this, but cant resist any longer. > > imho- neogeo vs. paleogeo is a totally false construction, designed > just to provoke attention. I know lots of hip old geo types, and lots > of young geo dorks. so what? > > I'd much rather see a panel on how modern web geo tech like geo REST, > geoJSON, geoRSS, open layers, etc, can be effectively integrated with > older GIS tech to develop genuinely useful new knowledge for new > populations. A comparison of 'tricks of the trade" that would be a > constructive experience for everyone, or a discussion of entirely new > possibilities that neither web hackers or GIS techies could achieve alone. > > fwiw > > Mike > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Geowanking mailing list > [email protected] > http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org > _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
