Just made a little souvenir from that discussion: http://protogeo.info/aa/GeowankerPaleoNeo_Nov2008.jpg
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:56 AM, P Kishor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Liebhold for President (or Finance Secretary or any other coveted > post)... for he that spake words of wisdome deserveth to be the leader > of all wankers, both neo and geo alike. > > And, for the segfault's sake, no more name dropping of rhetoricians > and ontologists on a mailing list prides itself on being a few inches > below navel-gazing. > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Mike Liebhold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've remained silent during all of this, but cant resist any longer. > > > > imho- neogeo vs. paleogeo is a totally false construction, designed > > just to provoke attention. I know lots of hip old geo types, and lots > > of young geo dorks. so what? > > > > I'd much rather see a panel on how modern web geo tech like geo REST, > > geoJSON, geoRSS, open layers, etc, can be effectively integrated with > > older GIS tech to develop genuinely useful new knowledge for new > > populations. A comparison of 'tricks of the trade" that would be a > > constructive experience for everyone, or a discussion of entirely new > > possibilities that neither web hackers or GIS techies could achieve > alone. > > > > fwiw > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Puneet Kishor http://punkish.eidesis.org/ > Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies http://www.nelson.wisc.edu/ > Open Source Geospatial Foundation (OSGeo) http://www.osgeo.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Geowanking mailing list > [email protected] > http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org > -- http://proto-geo.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
