FYI: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=4782703

Sort of antithesis to WPS.

What I'm playing with is creating a distributed architecture for web
mapping that, on the back end, handles petabytes of data but allows
for insanely high traffic bursts. WMS and WPS don't quite hack it. So,
you push the basemap rendering back further away from the user and any
analysis and computation closer towards the user.

Google's solved some of these issues but they only have one static
basemap with a very limited set of features. They also are able to
rely on essentially infinite processing power. They also don't provide
for any real analysis (yet).

What I'm trying to piece together is a system that lets privileged
users combine layers and design and generate a tile cache rapidly in
order to support bursts in traffic. For example, the USGS
earthquake.usgs.gov site typically sees 250K hits per second
immediately following an earthquake event. Currently, maps on that
site are generated as static images that get pushed out to Akamai.

I definitely have enough for an MS - especially in CompSci. But coming
up with a Geography question is much tougher.

-Eric

-=--=---=----=----=---=--=-=--=---=----=---=--=-=-
Eric B. Wolf                          720-209-6818
USGS Geographer
Center of Excellence in GIScience
PhD Student
CU-Boulder - Geography




On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Raj Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Web Processing Service
> http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/wps
> ---
> Raj
>
>
> On Mar 11, at 12:58 PM, Sean Gillies wrote:
>
>> "OGC Web Pipe Service"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
>

_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org

Reply via email to