I don't think anybody would disagree that what you've accomplished is 
impressive and inspiring, but success at the local does not equal a national 
initiative (re: data.gov) 


Ian White. :: Urban Mapping Inc 
690 Fifth Street Suite 200 
San Francisco. CA 94107 
T.415.946.8170 x800. :: F.866.385.8266. :: urbanmapping.com

________________________________

From: [email protected] 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Sat May 23 00:02:29 2009
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] Data dot gov now open 


Dan described a situation where Petaluma is close to meltdown with public 
records requests.

In a similar situation, New Orleans' Mayor Ray Nagin has been inundated with 
public records requests for various reasons, including the needs that 
organizations and neighborhoods have for data related to Katrina disaster and 
recovery, the intransigence of a mayor who has been under assault through a 
series of scandals, and extreme dissatisfaction with the pace of recovery. The 
mayor has exacerbated the problem by squeezing all public records requests 
through the bottleneck of the city attorney's office. Combined with utter 
insolence by department heads to cooperate with the Council and citizens making 
simple records requests, and now a virtual war is underway, with public records 
requests being used as the salvos fired back and forth. We're in a sprint to 
the 2010 elections, hoping we don't lose too much in the meantime.

It's time to take politics, personalities, the inefficiencies of paper forms, 
and shadow data hidden away in Excel spreadsheets, out of the process of 
getting information to the community.

When the data is there for anyone to use -- and when intermediaries like Dan 
can make that data useful to a broad audience -- we can start to have 
discussions about what the data means, rather than how to get the data. 

It's a brave new world, and I like it. 

Brian Denzer
http://nolastat.org




On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Dan Lyke <[email protected]> wrote:


        On Fri, 22 May 2009 15:13:11 -0500
        Brian Denzer <[email protected]> wrote:
        > By the way, this is going to have enormous implications for local
        > governments. The precedent is now established for open data policies
        > everywhere. Whether those policies offer truly meaningful
        > tranparency, or just a veneer, will be up to us to discern.
        
        
        This may not be word-for-word, but it's pretty close: "We are only one
        well-crafted sunshine law request from total meltdown". In Petaluma,
        California, at least, the IT department has no particular budget to get
        ahead of this curve, so there's no systemic funding to get data out,
        but there are a number of individuals who understand that their jobs
        long-term are going to be much much easier if they get the data out
        there first, rather than having to retrieve and correlate it after the
        fact based on a sunshine law request.
        
        One of the mashups I did was grabbing recent building permits out of
        the online database and dropping them on Google maps via GeoRSS. Doesn't
        seem too interesting to see that you're neighbor's getting their water
        heater replaced, but this got some neurons firing, and they're now
        seeing if they can get the planning and permitting process online so
        that we can do mashups to make sure that the new developments aren't
        bombshells dropped off-handedly in city council meetings.
        
        Dan
        

        _______________________________________________
        Geowanking mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
        


_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org

Reply via email to