Charles,

I understand that routing improvements are not in the budget as they are not
required for any Census operations.  However, The Census Bureau must realize
that they produce the only publicly available nationwide dataset of this
type that has far broader applications than their own internal business
needs.  What can we do as a community to try to help secure funding or to
create relationships with other government agencies (federal or otherwise)
to whom these enhancements would be valuable?  With a dataset as import as
this street data is, we need to make sure that we keep the blinders off.

David

On 4/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

I don't think there will be any further releases of TIGER/Line Files (see
http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/future/future_tl.html), though the
information will be released in several other forms, once or twice a year.

The underlying database will have more accurate coordinate information for
more counties, as the MAF/TIGER Accuracy Improvement Program completes,
but
new data that would help with routing, such as turn restrictions, speeds,
and one-way streets, are not included.  They are not in the budget, and
not
required by any planned operation that would justify them in the budget.

Charles Dingman, Geographer/301-763-1120
4H040, Geography Division
US Census, 4600 Silver Hill Rd Stop 7400
Washington, DC 20233-7400



             "Tom Longson
             (nym)"
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                          To
             m>                        [email protected]
             Sent by:                                                   cc
             geowanking-bounce
             [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                      Subject
                                       Re: [Geowanking] Map Image APIs

             04/24/2007 05:09
             PM


             Please respond to
             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                 burri.to






>From what I understand using TIGER for routing is a bad idea because
TIGER
doesn't say which roads are one way, on ramps, off ramps, etc. Could be
potentially dangerous, although very cool regardless. I personally love
this...

"Graphserver will return an itinerary between any two connected vertices,
even if the itinerary is absurd. In this case traveling by bus and foot
from downtown Seattle to deep within the foothills of the Cascade
Mountians
involves an eight-hour hike from one of the most remote bus stops in the
county." - http://graphserver.sourceforge.net/img/absurd_route_large.png

Anyone have info when the next release of TIGER is expected, and if it
will
have more data to solve some of these routing problems?

Tom Longson
________________
CAR&D / Cars.com


On 4/24/07, Paul Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  Ryan Sarver wrote:

  > We run mapserver internally and I was trying to avoid it as a
  > consumer-facing app could be pretty taxing on the system. It's much
  more
  > fun to use someone else's resources :). But its sounding like that
  might
  > be my best bet.

  Robust at a software level, not so much at a "good answers" level. Using
  TIGER for routing is contraindicated.

  --

     Paul Ramsey
     Refractions Research
     http://www.refractions.net
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
     Phone: 250-383-3022
     Cell: 250-885-0632
  _______________________________________________
  Geowanking mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking


_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking




--
************************************
David William Bitner
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking

Reply via email to