Thanks Greg, The snippet that you sent includes critical info for me.
We have a business need to support complex features with WFS. That does not appear to be coming (from ESRI) for at least 18 months from my reading of the info available. Please correct me if I'm wrong ESRI. Bruce --------------------------------------- Bruce Bannerman IT Solutions Architect - GIS Information Development Branch Minerals and Petroleum Division Department of Primary Industries - Victoria Australia "Greg Yetman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18/06/2007 02:11 PM Please respond to [email protected] To [email protected] cc Subject Re: [Geowanking] ESRI Products and OGC Services Bruce, Apologies to you (and the list) for sending redundant information. That's what I get for responding too quickly -- I read right past the part of your note that mentioned that you already know about the link that I sent. As for real-world experience, I haven't tried working with ESRI's OGC stuff beyond WMS since ArcIMS 4 (the WFS connector available back then). The WMS support in ArcIMS 9.1 seems OK; our client handles it fine. I don't like how they handle layers though, from what I remember it's hard with a client to get only one from a service based on ArcIMS out. We haven't installed ArcIMS 9.2 yet. I am interested in seeing what's in the next release, especially for server. I'm more interested in the ability to consume services for use in anlaysis that can provide results to our users than publishing with ESRI. I'm not sure how scalable server is for WMS publishing, but it's hard to beat the analysis tools that you can publish with it. I asked about OGC support in the pre-conference survey for the ESRI user conference this year. I receive two replies, including this: <snip> "We are going to support WFS and WFS-T as part of ArcGIS Server at 9.3 (winter). We are making a major investment with 9.3 to do a number of things: upgrade WMS (including support for legend modification), WCS (for raster format), and WFS (with simple GML)." <snip> >From Jack Dangermond, no less! Well, from a staff person on his behalf, but I was suprised to see his e-mail in my inbox. cheers, Greg Notice: This email and any attachments may contain information that is personal, confidential, legally privileged and/or copyright.No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the prior written consent of the copyright owner. It is the responsibility of the recipient to check for and remove viruses. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email, delete it from your system and destroy any copies. You are not authorised to use, communicate or rely on the information contained in this email. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
_______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
