finally, a topic worth discussing! if you want to see what the future of a goog 
wiki-map world, india could be a good place to look--sure, they've provided a 
valuable service in creating a base map, but at what cost? anybody know if 
participants were paid or volunteer? given GPS devices or loaners? any chance 
the underlying map data will be released? if i were google, i sure as hell 
wouldn't make it available to anybody else--damn smart and cheap way to get a 
'good enough' base map. i'm sure g recognizes that their 'go it alone approach 
in a user-contributed world' ain't going to give them NVT/TA quality data (love 
it or not, it is high quality) today, but over time it's something that google 
may find it doesn't have to pay any licensing fees for (not that NVT/TA derive 
much $$$ from the interwebs--it's under 5% of their business). But...as g 
begins to move more into different platforms (android, in car nav (don't forget 
the VW deal), and direct acquisition of sat imagery (don't forget this one: 
http://mashable.com/2007/07/21/google-image-america/), all your 
fears/hopes/dreams may come true!



Ian White  ::  Urban Mapping Inc
690 Fifth Street  Suite 200  ::  San Francisco  CA  94107
T.415.946.8170 x80  ::  F.866.385.8266
blog.urbanmapping.com  ::  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

________________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Fee [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 9:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] MapMaker

Why? To cut out the providers and control the data for themselves.  Who
wants to deal with NAVTEQ or others when they can just pay interns to
drive cars around cities of the world and take pictures/GPS or get
Google fan boys to update their maps for free?

--
James Fee GISP
RSP Architects
502 South Collge Avenue, Suite 203, Tempe, AZ 85281
480-889-2095 (w)
602-819-2142 (m)
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Landon Blake
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 9:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] MapMaker

Good point Kevin. In that case, Google's motive does seem a little more
suspect, doesn't it?

Why would anyone map Bermuda for Google if it was already mapped?

Landon

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Mayall
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 9:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] MapMaker

Let's not assume that the countries listed in Google Map Maker are
"unmapped regions of the world".  Bermuda and Cayman, for example, are
very well mapped.  Google just doesn't own any data for them.

Kevin (in Bermuda)



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Landon Blake
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] MapMaker

I just checked out the Google Map Maker web application this morning. I
was pretty impressed with the simple interface.

I've always admired the way Google can tackle a problem and design a
slick solution. I don't know how I'd live without my G-Mail.

Still, there terms of use really bites the big one. Seems to me like
these terms would be a deal killer for a lot of volunteer mappers. (I
sure won't be adding to there database. Why do that when you can
contribute to Open Street Map?)

It seems like Google is ignoring a principle that can be drawn from open
source software development: absolute control chokes voluntary
contributions.

I do, however, think that mapping unknown regions of the world will only
benefit society as a whole. If the data is publicly accessible, but
Google makes a dime, is that a horrible thing? They might end up mapping
something that would have never been mapped otherwise.

Imagine what Google could have accomplished if it had worked with an
organization like OSM to map unmapped regions of the world. It's too bad
they were so short-sighted in this respect.

The Sunburned Surveyor



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SteveC
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 10:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Geowanking] MapMaker

What no mention of GMM on geowanking yet? And I was looking forward to
the disucssion!

        http://www.opengeodata.org/?p=307

Best

Steve

_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking


Warning:
Information provided via electronic media is not guaranteed against
defects including translation and transmission errors. If the reader is
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please
notify the sender immediately.
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking

Reply via email to