The other alternative to this if people think it still could be fixed would be to have two vote counters. Everybody sent it to two addresses. That way there would be a cross check between the two counters.
I can easily volunteer to be a vote counter if people like that idea? Jenn --- Mike Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What if one person agreed to accept the votes and > everyone sent them a private message. That way the > sender name would be on it, which would (hopefully) > prevent people voting more than once. > > --- Ehrenfried Ehrenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jenn Millington schrieb: > > > That way a cookie is stored and it knows you've > > already voted. > > > > > You can delete this cookie and vote again and > > again... So this poll > > wouldn't have any validity for me. I know, some > > polls store the > > IP-address, but it doesn't protect against abuse > > either, because most > > people get a new IP with each dial in. Only a non > > anonymous opinion > > poll would be acceptable for me. So, who it want > can > > tell his/her > > opinion here in the list... > > > > Ehrenfried > > > ===== > Elaine Lynch > Bilbo and Sam > AGS member > We will miss you Frodo. > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! > http://auctions.yahoo.com ______________________________________________________________________ Web-hosting solutions for home and business! http://website.yahoo.ca
