I was wondering how long it would be before this would come up :) My vote would definately be for >= 1.4....
James:- are there any limitations on this as far as the seed code is concerned? On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 15:33:51 -0400 (EDT), "Aaron Mulder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Can we assume JDK 1.4? I would like to, but historically I've > seen a lot of resistance to requiring the "latest and greatest". > > Aaron > -- Gareth Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users: http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html
