-dain
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 02:33 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Can we assume JDK 1.4? I would like to, but historically I've seen a lot of resistance to requiring the "latest and greatest".
Aaron
-dain
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 02:33 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Can we assume JDK 1.4? I would like to, but historically I've seen a lot of resistance to requiring the "latest and greatest".
Aaron