I'd vote for 1.4, but I suspect we're going to have to do 1.3+. That doesn't mean we can't write optimisations for running on 1.4 though, and dynamically switch implementations where appropriate.
Alex. On Friday, Aug 8, 2003, at 20:33 Europe/London, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Can we assume JDK 1.4? I would like to, but historically I've seen a lot of resistance to requiring the "latest and greatest".
Aaron
