Whoops, it looks like I put words into Alex's mouth, I, Sean, sent the previous message. Sorry for the confusion.
Sean On Friday 15 August 2003 11:15 am, Sean Hamblett wrote: > On Friday 15 August 2003 04:06 am, Alex Blewitt wrote: > > To help organize the communication I have created the following topic, > JSR-77 Implementation here > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ApacheJ2EE/Volunteers-_Topics > > I hope this helps identify everyone involved in bringing this together. I > don't know if we want to add a page under the Architecture page, and > centralize our communication efforts (design docs, etc.). > > Sean > > > On Friday, Aug 15, 2003, at 01:50 Europe/London, Greg Wilkins wrote: > > > JSR77 is a bit strange. > > > > > > It specifies object models, but without saying that they are actual > > > classes and definitely not saying what package they are in. > > > > I think it just defines object models, doesn't it? > > > > > Thus I think we should put the classes that implement the JSR77 object > > > models into the spec module. But pick our own suitable package > > > name for them. I think org.apache.management.j2ee is what we > > > should use. > > > > Is JSR77 actually only J2EE? I thought it could be used outside of J2EE > > (say, for example, in avalon or other type frameworks). > > > > Might be better to remove the 'j2ee' -- why not use 'jsr77' since > > that's what it's known as on this list, and possibly others as well? > > > > Alex.
