I'm going to try to create a implementation that respects 77 with a
ModelMBean today. If this does work we will be able to make any pojo
respect 77.
-dain
On Friday, August 15, 2003, at 03:06 AM, Alex Blewitt wrote:
On Friday, Aug 15, 2003, at 01:50 Europe/London, Greg Wilkins wrote:
JSR77 is a bit strange.
It specifies object models, but without saying that they are actual
classes and definitely not saying what package they are in.
I think it just defines object models, doesn't it?
Thus I think we should put the classes that implement the JSR77 object
models into the spec module. But pick our own suitable package
name for them. I think org.apache.management.j2ee is what we
should use.
Is JSR77 actually only J2EE? I thought it could be used outside of
J2EE (say, for example, in avalon or other type frameworks).
Might be better to remove the 'j2ee' -- why not use 'jsr77' since
that's what it's known as on this list, and possibly others as well?
Alex.
/*************************
* Dain Sundstrom
* Partner
* Core Developers Network
*************************/
