I had exactly the same problem although I didn't have time to try to fix it.
About openJMS being a black-box, does it provide all the functionality we need? If it doesn't seeing it as a black-box won't work since we'll need to add functionality, right? On 2 Sep 2003, Stefan Schuster wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to build OpenJMS 10 minutes ago, but > it failed with missing dependencies in the > maven repository at ibiblio. I guess you are > right, and we should consider openJMS a black-box > system. > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 11:23, Daniel S. Haischt wrote: > > founder_chen wrote: > > > > > Hi, Stefan > > > Thanks for response in advance. Well, I have some > > > questions: > > > 1. Which openjms version should we check out? (The > > > lastest version is openjms0.7.6 rc1 > > > at http://sourceforge.net/projects/openjms) > > > > wouldn't it be the best solution to just use a OpenJMS > > release instead of using the CVS sources. if possible > > the OpenJMS system should be considered as a black > > box system which means that you don't know most of > > the internals. > > > > > > > > 2. What's integration options of OpenJMS? Such as ... > > > > > > > how about a Java Connector API v1.5 compliant resource > > adapter? > > > > regards > > > > daniel s. haischt > > -- > > > > > -- > Stefan > >
