> From: Daniel S. Haischt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thies Edeling wrote: > > [...] > > > > > About openJMS being a black-box, does it provide all the functionality > we > > need? > > just a quick note: > > we need ... > > a) JMS API 1.1 support > b) XA (distributed transaction support) > > those are the boundaries and both requirements are missing > at the time in OpenJMS AFAIK.
Both are required, but not immediately. I would expect JMS 1.1 support to be available by Q1 2004, possibly earlier. > > > If it doesn't seeing it as a black-box won't work since we'll need > > to add functionality, right? > > > > my understanding is, that missing features should be added to the > CVS repository of the OpenJMS project and won't be a part of the > Geronimo efforts. so adding features should be coordinated with > the OpenJMS project team. Correct. -Tim
