sounds like a really good idea, saves redundant datasource configuration in the end product. I don't think who's going to do it is an issue right now assuming we're in the spec-phase right now.
On 2 Sep 2003, Stefan Schuster wrote: > Hi, > > here is another thought : maybe we should > enhance openJMS, so it is able to use > our DataSources for message persistence. > We do not necessarily have to work on > this ourselfes, maybe the openJMS > developers want to do this anyway... > > I saw this concept in JBoss, and think it > is quite elegant. > > -- > Stefan > >
