Attention is currently required from: arehbein.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602 )

Change subject: WIP: vty: Add check against sensible default value for Ny1
......................................................................


Patch Set 9:

(13 comments)

File src/osmo-bsc/bts.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/594c7528_17c128f5
PS9, Line 535:  if (!gsm_bts_check_ny1(bts, LOGL_ERROR, "Value of Ny1 too 
low.")) {
This string can probably go inside the gsm_bts_check_ny1 function.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/7d9f4a2b_889360b2
PS9, Line 1725: /* Return 'true' iff ny1 satisfies network requirements, 
otherwise return a suggestion for ny1.
"Ny1" (see initial cap).
BTW I think this comment needs to be updated, I don't see it returning any 
"suggestion".


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/8dbb7c58_755159a9
PS9, Line 1727: bool gsm_bts_check_ny1(struct gsm_bts *bts, unsigned int 
log_level, char const *msg)
const always first. Also, "msg" name is usually used for struct msgb, better 
call it "str".


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/06324143_a7020bb8
PS9, Line 1729:         struct gsm_lchan *gl = gsm_bts_get_cbch(bts);
we usually use "lchan" as variable name for a struct gsm_lchan.
Why are you getting a CBCH lchan here btw?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/7f753c77_4c7e325d
PS9, Line 1738:         unsigned long T3105 = 
osmo_tdef_get_entry(bts->network->T_defs, 3105)->val;
You can use osmo_tdef_get() here. Passing -1 to "val_if_not_present" param akes 
care of proper exiting if the timer is not found (shouldn't happen).


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/0c071ad3_7c42de9e
PS9, Line 1740:         unsigned long ny1 = 
osmo_tdef_get_entry(bts->network->T_defs, -3105)->val;
Same, osmo_tdef_get()


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/a5045235_1cecaf44
PS9, Line 1742:         bool ny1_satisfies_requirements = T3105 * ny1 > T3124 + 
GSM_NY1_REQ_DELTA;
We usually declare variables at the start of the function/block.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/856f773a_855077d4
PS9, Line 1744:                 unsigned long ny1_recommended = (T3124 + 
GSM_NY1_REQ_DELTA)/T3105 + 1;
Why this +1? can you explain?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/11c8a152_b2b01c89
PS9, Line 1748:         return ny1_satisfies_requirements;
You can simplify all this code with early return:

if (T3105 * ny1 < T3124 + GSM_NY1_REQ_DELTA) {
    unsigned long ny1_recommended = (T3124 + GSM_NY1_REQ_DELTA)/T3105 + 1;
    LOGP(DNM, log_level, "%s Is: %lu Lowest recommendation: %lu\n", msg,
                     ny1, ny1_recommended);
    return false;
}
return true;


File src/osmo-bsc/bts_ipaccess_nanobts_omlattr.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/7767e628_93eaad1c
PS9, Line 96:   (void) gsm_bts_check_ny1(bts, LOGL_NOTICE, "Value of Ny1 should 
be higher.");
In one function is "should be lower" and here "should be higher"? This probably 
makes no sense.


File tests/nanobts_omlattr/nanobts_omlattr_test.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/642a3ec1_9fa75aec
PS9, Line 127: static unsigned long const T3105_TESTVAL = 13;
> Move const after static - use 'static const unsigned long'

Please fix. const always at the start (well, after "static" in this case as the 
linter says).


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/16fd2c9f_9bb0546c
PS9, Line 130: static unsigned long const NY1_TESTVAL = (GSM_T3124_MAX + 
GSM_NY1_REQ_DELTA)/T3105_TESTVAL + 1;
> Move const after static - use 'static const unsigned long'

Please fix.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602/comment/591c2218_e53633da
PS9, Line 133:  { .T = -3105, .default_val = GSM_NY1_DEFAULT, .val = 
NY1_TESTVAL, .unit = OSMO_TDEF_CUSTOM,
My understanding from the comments above is that you want to set Ny1 to have it 
applied in the attr_bts_expected[] below. That's fine.
If T3105 is not needed in the test, then simply don't set it and drop the 
comment.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30602
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If3f96a6bd4f9ae32b6421de43c1c5a5d64482089
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30602
Gerrit-PatchSet: 9
Gerrit-Owner: arehbein <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: arehbein <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 10:51:34 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to