Attention is currently required from: neels, pespin, fixeria, msuraev.

dexter has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/31415 )

Change subject: bts_features: Add features for HR formats (TS 101813 vs. 
RFC5993)
......................................................................


Patch Set 8:

(1 comment)

File include/osmocom/gsm/bts_features.h:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/31415/comment/379b4fa6_dda6ba66
PS7, Line 39: _TX
> A couple of extra points here: […]
@neels: You are correct. Thats how it works. (In the DSP case the RTP packets 
are going through l1sap.c as well, but the DSP is generating the payloads.)

@pespin: In a correctly configured setup we should always see the same format 
in both directions. I also can understand the objections against the "_TX_", so 
I am fine with dropping that again.

I thought the OML feature flags were introduced for things like this. I also 
see no other way to find out which BTS model supports which format. The BSC 
knows that it talks to an osmo-bts, but it does not know if this BTS model is a 
PHY based model with TS 101318 support or an osmo-trx based model with RFC 5993 
support.

Extending IPACC can be also a way, here we can at least be sure that osmo-bts 
type BTSs will support the extension but we will have to make sure that older 
osmo-bts versions will tolerate/ignore the extensions. To me this sounds 
difficult and since the implementation in osmo-mgw is already done I would opt 
for the OML flag based method.

Please let me know what you think.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/31415
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I05e4ed7a85f3a0451de7cd07380503a7ac76d043
Gerrit-Change-Number: 31415
Gerrit-PatchSet: 8
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: msuraev <[email protected]>
Gerrit-CC: neels <[email protected]>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: msuraev <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:16:57 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <[email protected]>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <[email protected]>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <[email protected]>
Comment-In-Reply-To: msuraev <[email protected]>
Comment-In-Reply-To: dexter <[email protected]>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to