Attention is currently required from: osmith, pespin.

fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-gprs/+/34044 )

Change subject: rlcmac: Fix Starting Time rfn->fn calculation
......................................................................


Patch Set 6: Code-Review+1

(3 comments)

File src/rlcmac/rlcmac_dec.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-gprs/+/34044/comment/169eaa6c_4c70e47b
PS6, Line 437: t3 = tbf_start_time->N51
Are you sure this is correct? On the left (before this patch) `t3` field was 
assigned the value of `tbf_start_time->N26`, but now it's 
`tbf_start_time->N51`. Ah, now it matches what `gsm_fn2gsmtime()` is doing, so 
looks correct. Nevermind.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-gprs/+/34044/comment/ba487d5a_6fce381f
PS6, Line 439: 51 * OSMO_MOD_FLR((t3 - t2), 26) + t3 + 51 * 26 * t1p;
AFAICS, this is pretty much a copy-paste from libosmogsm. Is there a reason to 
reinvent `gsm_gsmtime2fn()` here? Can't we keep the function as it was, and 
simply do `gsm_rfn2fn`?

```
const uint16_t rfn = gsm_gsmtime2fn(&g_time);
const uint32_t fn = gsm_rfn2fn(rfn, curr_fn);
```


File tests/rlcmac/rlcmac_types_test.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-gprs/+/34044/comment/d0ec9690_54c93307
PS3, Line 54: printf
> This allows easily separating internal logging from test specific logging. […]
Not blocking, marking as resolved.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-gprs/+/34044
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: libosmo-gprs
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I00741289333853a8db472950ee2ac38dc2c74fd3
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34044
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 17:53:11 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <[email protected]>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <[email protected]>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to