Attention is currently required from: daniel, lynxis lazus.

pespin has posted comments on this change by lynxis lazus. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37864?usp=email )

Change subject: add routing areas
......................................................................


Patch Set 5: Code-Review-1

(11 comments)

File include/osmocom/sgsn/gprs_routing_area.h:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37864/comment/b7c5393d_4136b025?usp=email
 :
PS5, Line 14:   struct osmo_routing_area_id ra;
rai? raid?

Otherwise we end up with ra->ra which is confusing.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37864/comment/61ff94b8_d2ae8a13?usp=email
 :
PS5, Line 50: void sgsn_ra_cell_free(struct sgsn_ra_cell *cell, bool 
drop_empty_ra);
disturbing that it has a free function but not an alloc function. This probably 
needs rethinking.


File src/sgsn/gprs_bssgp.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37864/comment/137ab8d2_89da0d68?usp=email
 :
PS5, Line 40: int bssgp_nm_bvc_reset_ind(struct osmo_bssgp_prim *bp)
this can be static afaict?


File src/sgsn/gprs_routing_area.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37864/comment/2e8beec6_23b4d5cb?usp=email
 :
PS5, Line 15:   /* FIXME: move to sgsn global context */
why not doing this already? sounds easy?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37864/comment/c93acb41_5c07420c?usp=email
 :
PS5, Line 27:   struct sgsn_ra_cell *cell, *cell2;
in general free functions allow null ptr.
if (!ra) return NULL;


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37864/comment/ae30db36_fe4b93f9?usp=email
 :
PS5, Line 29:   if (!llist_empty(&ra->cells)) {
this one is not needed right? the for_each below will simply skip.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37864/comment/1be3f837_b953cb1f?usp=email
 :
PS5, Line 43:   OSMO_ASSERT(cell);
in general free functions allow null ptr.
if (!cell) return NULL;


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37864/comment/e324e74e_8c23264c?usp=email
 :
PS5, Line 45:   if (!drop_empty_ra) {
all this code below is a bit chaotic, I encourage you to revisit it.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37864/comment/7c0eb2e6_385ccb35?usp=email
 :
PS5, Line 91: struct sgsn_ra *sgsn_ra_get_ra(const struct osmo_routing_area_id 
*rai)
sgsn_get_ra_by_rai() or sgsn_get_ra_by_raid()


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37864/comment/5b2fe178_0f062e38?usp=email
 :
PS5, Line 246:          } else if (cell && cell->ran_type != RA_TYPE_GERAN_Gb) {
this if before this one has an early return, so this "} else" can be removed, 
easing code read.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37864/comment/a0576c41_12d135e0?usp=email
 :
PS5, Line 281: }
All this function is also a bit cumbersome, I encourage doing a second thought 
too.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/37864?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-sgsn
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I2474b19a7471a1dea3c863ddf8372b16180211aa
Gerrit-Change-Number: 37864
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: lynxis lazus <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: daniel <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: lynxis lazus <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 19:14:27 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes

Reply via email to