pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sip-connector/+/14997 )
Change subject: Add further logging. ...................................................................... Patch Set 7: (2 comments) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/14997/1/src/mncc.c File src/mncc.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/14997/1/src/mncc.c@191 PS1, Line 191: struct in_addr net = { .s_addr = other->ip }; > Yes, mncc.ip is in host byte order, if that's the correct terminology. > certainly, using mncc. […] Well, according to existing code [mncc.ip = htonl(other->ip)], other->ip is host byte order, and mncc.ip is network byte order. And afar the struct in_addr net expects to have content in net byte order. So if I'm not wrong, either use "struct in_addr net = { .s_addr = mncc.ip };" or function above should be ntohl() instead of htonl(). https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/14997/1/src/mncc.c@192 PS1, Line 192: LOGP(DMNCC, LOGL_DEBUG, "SEND rtp_connect: IP=(%s) PORT=(%u)\n", inet_ntoa(net), mncc.port); > There are other places in the code that use inet_ntoa() […] Having inet_ntoa already in some places in code doesn't mean we should keep adding references to it. Using inet_ntop() doesn't imply a big change, it's mostly declaring a local buffer in the stack + using the new function, so let's use proper functions before merging since it's not a lot of extra hassle. man inet_ntop: "inet_ntop() extends the inet_ntoa(3) function to support multiple address families, inet_ntoa(3) is now considered to be deprecated in favor of inet_ntop()." -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sip-connector/+/14997 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-sip-connector Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I2620cce245be199d849d8fad3fc998c96c243f6b Gerrit-Change-Number: 14997 Gerrit-PatchSet: 7 Gerrit-Owner: keith <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: keith <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <[email protected]> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 08:10:18 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <[email protected]> Comment-In-Reply-To: keith <[email protected]> Gerrit-MessageType: comment
