[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christoph Egger) writes:
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Andreas Beck wrote:
> > No - if I got him right, he's talking about having a
> > struct span { int start,stop } spans[vis->virt.y].
>
> Yep. Andy, right you are. But thinking closer, I think it is better having a
> struct span { int start,stop } spans[vis->visible.y]. It makes more sense just
> ^^^^^^^
> to draw the real visible spans...
No, it makes no sense at all. Ofcourse you should draw everywhere on
the visual.
//Marcus
--
-------------------------------+------------------------------------
Marcus Sundberg | http://www.stacken.kth.se/~mackan
Royal Institute of Technology | Phone: +46 707 452062
Stockholm, Sweden | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RFC: XMI updates + development issues Jon M. Taylor
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Rodolphe Ortalo
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Christoph Egger
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Jon M. Taylor
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Christoph Egger
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Andreas Beck
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Christoph Egger
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Andrew Apted
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Marcus Sundberg
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Christoph Egger
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Andrew Apted
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Andreas Beck
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Marcus Sundberg
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Jon M. Taylor
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Andrew Apted
