On 9 Jun 2000, Marcus Sundberg wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christoph Egger) writes:
>
> > On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Andreas Beck wrote:
> > > No - if I got him right, he's talking about having a
> > > struct span { int start,stop } spans[vis->virt.y].
> >
> > Yep. Andy, right you are. But thinking closer, I think it is better having a
> > struct span { int start,stop } spans[vis->visible.y]. It makes more sense just
> > ^^^^^^^
> > to draw the real visible spans...
>
> No, it makes no sense at all. Ofcourse you should draw everywhere on
> the visual.
Can you explain it as detailed as you can, please? Only drawing the spans,
which are really visible on the monitor _can_ (but doesn't have to, if
vis->visible.y == vis->virt.y) be much faster.
Christoph Egger
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RFC: XMI updates + development issues Jon M. Taylor
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Rodolphe Ortalo
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Christoph Egger
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Jon M. Taylor
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Christoph Egger
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Andreas Beck
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Christoph Egger
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Andrew Apted
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Marcus Sundberg
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Christoph Egger
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Andrew Apted
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Andreas Beck
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Marcus Sundberg
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Jon M. Taylor
- Re: RFC: XMI updates + development issues Andrew Apted
