On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Andreas Beck wrote:
> > I have three simple propositions to make.
>
> > 1) Move GGI to sourceforge. This is the perfect environment for open
> > software creation. No more "anon cvs is borked" emails. Plus GGI becomes more
> > visible to the rest of the programming community. First rate service at a very
> > good price.
>
> I see the benefits, but our problem is not of a technical nature. It is
> a problem of motivation.
You are right. This is not a high prioritiy but it still seems to be the way
things are going in the opensource community. Backburner.
> > 2) Make it the explicit goal of the GGI project to implement either the QT
> > toolkit or GTK.
>
> I'd leave that to a separate effort. O.K. - it would give a goal - granted.
I agree now that I've seen the page on sourceforge. This GGItk doesn't seem
to be going any where right now but I will email the leader.
> I accept you for proposition 2. This is something we definitely _want_.
Good. I'll need access to the ftp and cvs of course in order to be totally in
sync with everyone.
Excellent. My greatest fear was to hear crickets.
Lee Brown Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
