On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 07:49:20AM -0500, Lee Brown wrote: > On Thu, 01 Feb 2001, John McCutchan wrote: > > These seems like overkill to me, Just let the application handle multiple > > cursors. I don't think this fits with the rest of the ggi architecture. > > > Right now, how does an application use a hardware cursor? It doesn't. The application should provide ggi with a cursor and the application can dicide to show or hide it. Based on the target ggi would use a hardware or a software cursor. My point was that when the application wants to change cursors it should give ggi a new cursor ggi shouldn't have a list of cursors that could be used on the visual. the application should, and it should change it as needed. John
- Re: does this look acceptable Tijs van Bakel
- Re: does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- Re: does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- Re: does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- Re: does this look acceptable Stefan Seefeld
- Re: does this look acceptable John McCutchan
- Re: does this look acceptable Andreas Beck
- Re: does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- Re: does this look acceptable Jon M. Taylor
- Re: does this look acceptable Brian S. Julin
- Re: does this look acceptable John McCutchan
- Re: does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- Re: does this look acceptable Stefan Seefeld
- Re: does this look acceptable Andreas Beck
- Re: does this look acceptable Jon M. Taylor
- Re: does this look acceptable Stefan Seefeld
- Re: does this look acceptable Andreas Beck
- Re: does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- Re: does this look acceptable Andreas Beck
- Re: does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- LibOVL and LibBlit (was: Re: does this look acceptabl... Christoph Egger
