On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 07:49:20AM -0500, Lee Brown wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Feb 2001, John McCutchan wrote:
> > These seems like overkill to me, Just let the application handle multiple
> > cursors. I don't think this fits with the rest of the ggi architecture.
> 
> 
> Right now, how does an application use a hardware cursor? 

It doesn't. The application should provide ggi with a cursor and the 
application can dicide to show or hide it. Based on the target ggi
would use a hardware or a software cursor. My point was that when the
application wants to change cursors it should give ggi a new cursor
ggi shouldn't have a list of cursors that could be used on the visual.
the application should, and it should change it as needed.

John

Reply via email to