On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Walter Reel wrote:

> I'm thinking of starting a port of Qt to a more
> direct/accelerated graphics layer.

IMO it's not the time to do this, because of lack of more advanced 2D
functionality in both KGI and GGI. But, as far as I can assess both,
GGI's development is one or two steps further than KGI to this point.

I suggest you to help out KGI or GGI to remove this lack.
 
> What are some benefits KGI/GGI may have over DirectFB?

Applications running on top of GGI can run everywhere GGI is ported
to, almost requiring only a re-complile.

Applications running on top of KGI profits _always_ from a fast and
secure graphic subsystem.

(Steffen: Please correct me, If I am wrong)


CU,

Christoph Egger
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to