Missed this reply
On 13 Jul 2001 12:23:44 -0400, Brian S. Julin wrote:
>
> On 13 Jul 2001, Thayne Harbaugh wrote:
> > I still feel very strongly about having a tight integration between the
> > individual libraries and the files that package them - I thingk it will
> > be encorage and improve maintainability. The spec file doesn't have to
> > be in a sub-directory but could go in ggi-core/libgii directly (similar
> > for all libs in CVS).
>
> "the" spec file? Is there to be only one per lib? I have seen before
> packages where there is a specfile alongside every Makefile.
Only one spec file per lib. Some packages, like WINE, have many spec
files but they aren't RPM packagine spec files - they are for building
individual WINE libraries.
These are the spec files needed:
libgii.spec.in
libggi.spec.in
libgalloc.spec.in
libgic.spec.in
libbse.spec.in
libgpf.spec.in
libggi3d.spec.in
libxml.spec.in
libblt.spec.in
libggimisc.spec.in
libovl.spec.in
libgcp.spec.in
libwmh.spec.in
There might be a few others. Each one of these might build multiple packages.
There should be a spec file for each discrete piece of the GGI CVS tree IMHO.
<SNIP>
> --
> Brian
--
Thayne Harbaugh
