On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Curtis Veit wrote:
> does not actually hold packages, so perhaps one of these?
>
> dist/
> package/
> packing/
> or
> pack/
I think "distro" has a nice trendy ring to it, personally :-)
This would be a good compromise, because the debian directory can
either be ignored, or linked to ./debian by the debian .diff file
if the materials in there are indeed in sync with the Debian
maintainer's work.
> Any comments on the suggestion to *only* support
> the generation of the source file for distros
> with the build system?
Well, that's what I'd like, but that isn't as important to me, and
it is not what Thayne would like, and he's the one who talked himself
into being the "build system guy," which has to be worth something
in bargaining power :-)
I mailed the listed Debian Maintainer a few days ago, and no response
yet. Perhaps if you were also to send him mail, we'd get his
attention :-)
--
Brian
