On 22 Feb 2013, at 17:50, Geoffrey Mainland <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't want to bike shed, but the prevalence of empty merge commits in > the repo seems both undesirable and avoidable. I always rebase my work > instead of merge. Is there a reason this is not standard practice in the > repo? It certainly makes for a nicer history. > I guess because rebasing means actually rewriting history. Which is undesirable in itself. Once commits have been pushed out, you should never rebase, afaik. Regards, -- Andy _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
