On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Geoffrey Mainland <[email protected]>wrote:
> I don't want to bike shed, but the prevalence of empty merge commits in > the repo seems both undesirable and avoidable. I always rebase my work > instead of merge. Is there a reason this is not standard practice in the > repo? It certainly makes for a nicer history. > When we switched we didn't want to affect people's current workflow too much (i.e. they already had to learn git so we kept rebasing out of it at the beginning.) -- Johan
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
