> My only claim was that I have a set of steps that can reliably reproduce > an error on my system, not that these steps will reliably reproduce it > on an arbitrary system, e.g., yours. Still, being able to reliably > reproduce an error, even if only on one system, is *very* useful. just misunderstood your use of the word "reliable". Certainly having this level of reproducibility is very helpful in debugging, even if it's only on one machine.
> So, to be clear, you see recache errors sporadically and for different > sets of tests across different runs, and you are running validate with > no extra arguments, single-threaded, on a Linux x86_64 system with an > ext4 file system? Yes, except I would say "very often" instead of "sporadically". I'm not sure about single-threaded. I run validate without any parameters - doesn't it use more then one thread in this case? Jan _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
