I just ran validation (once without any parameters and once with --normal) and got no failures, except for some tests that always fail. Looks like the problem may be solved.
Janek Dnia wtorek, 25 czerwca 2013, Geoffrey Mainland napisał: > On 06/24/2013 09:21 PM, Jan Stolarek wrote: > >> My only claim was that I have a set of steps that can reliably reproduce > >> an error on my system, not that these steps will reliably reproduce it > >> on an arbitrary system, e.g., yours. Still, being able to reliably > >> reproduce an error, even if only on one system, is *very* useful. > > > > just misunderstood your use of the word "reliable". Certainly having > > this level of > > > reproducibility is very helpful in debugging, even if it's only on one > > machine. > > >> So, to be clear, you see recache errors sporadically and for different > >> sets of tests across different runs, and you are running validate with > >> no extra arguments, single-threaded, on a Linux x86_64 system with an > >> ext4 file system? > > > > Yes, except I would say "very often" instead of "sporadically". I'm > > not sure about > > > single-threaded. I run validate without any parameters - doesn't it > > use more then one thread in > > > this case? > > It looks like running validate without any parameters will use 2 > threads. > > I've pushed a fix (I hope) for this issue. Could you check and see if > it's fixed for you now? > > Geoff _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
