Great, thanks for checking! On 06/25/2013 03:43 PM, Jan Stolarek wrote: > I just ran validation (once without any parameters and once with --normal) > and got no failures, > except for some tests that always fail. Looks like the problem may be solved. > > Janek > > Dnia wtorek, 25 czerwca 2013, Geoffrey Mainland napisał: >> On 06/24/2013 09:21 PM, Jan Stolarek wrote: >>>> My only claim was that I have a set of steps that can reliably reproduce >>>> an error on my system, not that these steps will reliably reproduce it >>>> on an arbitrary system, e.g., yours. Still, being able to reliably >>>> reproduce an error, even if only on one system, is *very* useful. >>> just misunderstood your use of the word "reliable". Certainly having >> this level of >> >>> reproducibility is very helpful in debugging, even if it's only on one >> machine. >> >>>> So, to be clear, you see recache errors sporadically and for different >>>> sets of tests across different runs, and you are running validate with >>>> no extra arguments, single-threaded, on a Linux x86_64 system with an >>>> ext4 file system? >>> Yes, except I would say "very often" instead of "sporadically". I'm >> not sure about >> >>> single-threaded. I run validate without any parameters - doesn't it >> use more then one thread in >> >>> this case? >> It looks like running validate without any parameters will use 2 >> threads. >> >> I've pushed a fix (I hope) for this issue. Could you check and see if >> it's fixed for you now? >> >> Geoff
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
