Tuncer, If warnings will be treated as errors it's fine to have "Error:" shown for them, I think.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Tuncer Ayaz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Konstantine Rybnikov wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I'm bringing this up once again. Can we add "Error:" in the output > > of an error in a similar way ghc shows "Warning:" for warnings? Main > > reasoning is that, for example, on a build-server, where you have > > lots of cores to build your program, if you get an error, it gets > > lost somewhere in the middle of compiler's output in all other > > "Warning" messages you get, since error is not always shown last on > > multi-core build. > > Isn't kind of a compiler convention that ""Warning:" is only prepended > if an issue is treated as a warning. I mean, you can enable -Werror > and treat all or specific warnings as errors as well. >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
