On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Konstantine Rybnikov wrote: > Tuncer, > > If warnings will be treated as errors it's fine to have "Error:" > shown for them, I think.
Yes, it will be printed the same way and have the same severity as any other error. I think I have misinterpreted your initial post, sorry about that. To correct myself, compilers do print "error:" prefixes, and for example your usual CC will print the following: filename:row:column: error: error-message filename:row:column: warning: warning-message So on second thought your suggestion makes sense :). > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Konstantine Rybnikov wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > I'm bringing this up once again. Can we add "Error:" in the > > > output of an error in a similar way ghc shows "Warning:" for > > > warnings? Main reasoning is that, for example, on a > > > build-server, where you have lots of cores to build your > > > program, if you get an error, it gets lost somewhere in the > > > middle of compiler's output in all other "Warning" messages you > > > get, since error is not always shown last on multi-core build. > > > > Isn't kind of a compiler convention that ""Warning:" is only > > prepended if an issue is treated as a warning. I mean, you can > > enable -Werror and treat all or specific warnings as errors as > > well. _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
