I'd like to try and do both, since this shouldn't be hard and doesn't look like top-priority.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Simon Peyton Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > There has been quite a long email trail about this. Would someone like to > summarise in a Trac ticket feature request? > > Assuming there's a consensus, would anyone like to offer a patch? Should > not hard. > > There will be an annoying cutover problem, because many regression tests > will start failing. Anyone offering the patch would need to include all of > those. Of course it'll affect other packages too -- hence the need for > consensus. > > Simon > > | -----Original Message----- > | From: ghc-devs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sven > | Panne > | Sent: 25 January 2015 11:28 > | To: Konstantine Rybnikov > | Cc: [email protected] > | Subject: Re: Put "Error:" before error output > | > | 2015-01-23 12:55 GMT+01:00 Konstantine Rybnikov <[email protected]>: > | > If warnings will be treated as errors it's fine to have "Error:" shown > | for > | > them, I think. > | > | +1 for this, it is how e.g. gcc behaves with -Werror, too. So unless > | there is a compelling reason to do things differently (which I don't > | see here), I would just follow conventional behavior instead of being > | creative. :-) > | _______________________________________________ > | ghc-devs mailing list > | [email protected] > | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
